So I'm in my local comics shoppe yesterday, and, as is my wont, I pick up the latest issue of this:
Yet, also released,
on the very same day, is
this:
OMG--two books,
from two different companies, about the same character?!?
And yet, the world continued to spin on its axis. No riots at the comic shoppes, no mass hysteria, no cats and dogs living together.
So, as we ponder the post-lawsuit future of
Superman, we should remember this: there's room for more than one interpretation.
And just to be clear, I'm not making
any statement about the right or wrong of anyone's case, who owes whom what, the wisdom of our copyright system, or anything else like that. That's for wiser, more learned folks than I.
But comics fans tend to be small-c conservative (and I include myself in that description), and sometimes we react
poorly to the prospect of a real change to the way things have always been. And when it is sometimes noted that one
possible outcome of the lawsuit is that there might be
two versions of Superman at different companies--one comprised of elements
Siegel and
Shuster own, the other still at
DC comprised of elements they own--the possibility is greeted by a vague sense of panic. "
They can't do that! There's always been one Superman, and he's always been at DC, and that's the way it should always be! It would be two confusing! It would destroy the character I love!" I know, because those same thoughts flit through my mind, t0o.
But we're more adaptable to change than we give ourselves credit for, and our
imaginative capacity is far greater than we think it is. We can have two
competing versions of
John Carter Of Mars being published, and our brains don't implode. We can have
Guy Ritchie's Sherlock Holmes AND Steven Moffat's Sherlock Holmes being out there
simultaneously, and we can handle it (and the concept of multiple Holmes is
so acceptable,
CBS is developing its own pilot of a modernized Sherlock Holmes). We can have competing visions of
Alice In Wonderland, or
Dracula, or
Battlestar: Galactica, and the republic will continue to stand. We can have a
Batman cartoon that's two reboots separated from the current "
real" Batman, but still love both versions.
Heck, even
Kal-El himself is
already subject to multiple versions of himself at DC. Right now the 3
nu52 magazines he's appearing in take place at three different time periods in his life, and as far as I can tell they might as well be three different characters. And, as by good pal
Siskoid has been pointing out
for the last year, there have been hundreds of variations of Supes at DC over the years.
So, if the lawsuit results in a "
splitting" of Superman's rights, we shouldn't panic. We can live with, and even love, multiple Supermen, and the concept can even thrive and grow under such an arrangement. We'll survive, and the
Man Of Steel will survive, just as John Carter has.
