Saturday, April 12, 2008

Lifestyles of the Rich and Evil

Let's say--hypothetically--that it's 1978. You're the richest man in the world (not to mention an "international industrial pirate"). How do you spend a lazy Saturday afternoon?

Eat your heart out, Bill Gates!That's right, you:
A) Lounge about in the sophisticated control center of your high tech "super-ship"
B) Have a "simian squad" of guards to dispatch interlopers--yes, actual gorilla guards! (What, he stole the idea from Fu Manchu??)
C) Dress up in a faux sailors' outfit while ordering around be-jumpsuited minions
D) Enjoy a few cultured puffs from your cigarette holder
E) Kick back and relax with a Star Wars novel
F) All of the above.

F would be the correct answer. And, you doubting Thomases who need corrective eye ware, "Dimitrios the Golden Greek" is indeed perusing a Star Wars novel:

Splinter of the Mind's Eye?? the Take that, you pathetic poor people!! That's living large!

Much, much more about Dimitrios tomorrow, including (but not limited to) Batman versus an octopus AND a killer whale--AT THE SAME TIME!!

What I would do if I won the Mega Millions, as shown in The Brave and The Bold #140, 1978

Friday, April 11, 2008

Tales From the Quarter Bin--Targitt!!

He was a former military man who saw his wife and child killed as innocent bystanders in a mob hit. After getting no justice through traditional channels, he goes on a one-man rampage against the mob, determined to kill them all...

I did that all by myself...I'm so proud!No, I'm not talking about the Punisher, you silly people. I'm talking about John Targitt, the avenging angel of death also known as TARGITT!!

Really, it is a good coverYup, it's time to once again take a dip into Atlas waters. Barely a year after Frank Castle debuted in the pages of Spider-Man, Atlas' attempts to ape all things Marvel led, surely by coincidence, to a family-avenging vigilante who had no qualms about killing the bad guys. I assure you, a complete case of synchronicity...

But unlike the fun, gritty cover by Dick Giordano, the interior art by Howard Nostrand makes for a really odd story. His style here is almost cartoony, sort of Joe Staton-like, which makes for a fairly schizophrenic contrast with our Death Wish story line.

Perhaps it was necessary to soften the art in order to get this book approved by the Code. While Marvel was having the Avengers fight "zuvembies" because you weren't allowed to portray zombies in comic book, Atlas had a reputation of pushing the line on killings and violence and such. Well, on Targitt, they smashed through that line. And the Code never smacked them down (then again, they weren't around for long...). Ric Meyers script was heavy on slaughtering bad guys, and light on moralizing.

Let's skip over the explosion of the plane his family was on (because I don't feel like scanning a 2 page spread today). Meet John Targitt, FBI agent who manages to get over the grief of his family's death awfully quickly.

Dude, they died 5 minutes ago! Grieve a little...So he travels to Boston to hunt down the mobsters responsible, but they try to take him out first:

Yes, the 'try to shoot him from the opposite escalator' trick is the oldest in the book, in use since caveman days!But he strikes back, because all rogue FBI agents are packin' knives, and know how to throw them.

Let's see Mulder do thatWe then venture in a Dirty Harry rip-off, as Targitt tortures his perp by pummeling him in the knife wound he just caused. Note the cartoony look...why, torture is almost fun!!

The 'YOWP' means it hurtsWell, the next perp in the chain continues the Dirty Harry swiping, stealing lines almost verbatim, and without irony:

Go ahead--make my dayBut John Targitt will not put up with copyright infringement!!

Have a nice day, indeedYes, his head is completely through the door. Yes, he's dead. But he's only the first, as Targitt goes on a murder spree that makes Frank Castle look like Mary Marvel (oops, not such a good example any more, is it?)

First, let's take out a hitman--Archie-style!!

Murder, Riverdale styleCartoony or not, that's dead. So, John, really--what's the best way to deal with criminals?

Well, at least he provides burials...Oh. Okay. That explains this and this:

Dead, dead, dead...Enough. I've shown you less than half of the killings this issue, including Targitt blowing up hoods with hand grenades, and shooting down the head hoodlum's helicopter.

Interestingly, while Targitt could be seen as a Punisher knock-off, it should be noted that Punisher had only appeared once by that point, and was hardly the monster success that he is today (that didn't happen until the 80's, especially after Frank Miller made him cool again in his Daredevil run). So it's not as if Atlas were aping a hot comic trend. And younger fans, especially readers of today's Punisher stories, should realize that this level of violence--especially killing with guns--was completely uncommon in 70's books. it just didn't happen, especially at the Big Two.

It's also interesting that in that first Punisher story, the hero of the comic provided a moral counterpoint to Castle's Death Wish crusade. Not so here, as there's no one trying to stop Targitt from his rampage as an "avenging angel" (actual quote from the story!!). This was a common view in films of the day, but not so much in comics, mostly because of the Code.

Of course, this was Atlas. By the next issue (seriously...they re-thought the premise after one issue!!), the title of the mag was changed to John Targitt...Man-Stalker. Targitt was given a Marvel-like costume, and was now officially working undercover for the FBI, spending less time killing mobsters, and more time preventing the "Arabs" from stopping the Alaskan pipeline from being built, so they can raise oil prices (seriously). By the third (and final) issue, Gerry Conway was on board and co-scripting, and the "Marvelization" of the book was complete:

Can a cover be any more marvel wannabe?Really, now. That could be a generic Daredevil or Captain America cover from 1975, couldn't it?? Oh, Atlas...

So the moral of the story? If Martin Goodman had stayed on as Marvel publisher, this could have been what the Punisher looked like after a couple of appearances:

Worst costume ever?

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Final Crisis Preview--AAU Superstar

As we approach the unavoidable Final Crisis, I look back and see some of the changes I've been forecasting for the DC Universe: the return of forgotten heroes, comedians with their own comics, real-life Western heroes, camp teenage heroes (hey, I asked for Prez, and Morrison is giving us Anthro...oh so close!!), and Superbaby.

But I realize that there is one venue I forgot to tap to revitalize the DC Universe: advertisements. No, not those wonderful Hostess ads (although...). No, I'm referring to the glory of shoes, and specifically the AAU Superstar!!

More action in one panel than the past 2 years of New Avengers!As presented on the inside cover of Adventure Comics #457 (1978), this ad presents, I think, the greatest chance to bring the glory of heroism back to the DC Universe via a Grant Morrison dialectic. Unlike many other decompressed comics of today, the very first panel of this epic throws us into the deep end of villainy:

Boston Murdock? Matt Brand??Don't question how possession of the "Miracle Medicine" would bring the world to its knees (unless that was the only vial in existence, and if so, why are we wasting it on a punk like Tommy?). Instead, revel in the Morrisonian irony of using a character who is clearly a composite of Deadman and Daredevil (symbolically merging the two giant companies in the field, using images of death and evil), yet making him the villain, an obvious indictment of the industry's cold capitalism!! And at the same time, using him to present a devastating critique of the U.S. health care system!?! Fortunately for Tommy:

I miss Miracle Man...Clearly, Flex Mentallo was at least partially inspired by this, right?

PROTIP: When plotting world domination, spring for a rental car...on foot is no way to conquer civilizationNote the sound effect: by presenting "ZOOM" sideways, it becomes "MOON," suggesting that AAU Superstar's powers are not natural, but alien in origin. And given the state of amateur athletics, an obvious allusion to steroid use!!

Edna was right--NO CAPES!!...whereas in this panel, the "YANK" sound effect is an obvious dig at Americans, trying to keep their life-saving medicine away from Third World nations (that being, in and of itself, a reference to Kirby's Fourth World, and a pre-preview of Morrison's Fifth World!!)...note that said Third World is portrayed as "Sinister," yet the surname "Sole" indicates the author believes these other nation possess more "soul" than the greedy Americans, no matter how superior their steroid-enhanced running ability ("Shupernatural," indeed).

If bad puns were gravity, this panel would be a black holeThe banal dialogue of this panel, together with "America's" foot driven into the back of the "soleful" Third World, completes the critique of the comic industry and international relations. Or does it?

Mom and AAU Superstar are sooo doing it...That's right, the health care conundrum. In this universe, we must depend on capitalist, HGH-pumped ubermensch to provide us health...and don't forget, consumerism solves all health problems ("thanks to your shoes!"), as long as you don't stay too long in the hospital, you resource sponge (I'll be on my feet in no time!")!

So, if Grant Morrison didn't travel back in time to write this ad, he certainly should have. So I can practically guarantee* that Final Crisis will result in AAU Superstar becoming a part of the mainstream DC Universe!!

*guarantee has no value. Void where prohibited. No wagering allowed. Kids, if you read more comics than you can afford, join the club.

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Dan DiDio Obviously Missed This One...

From the letters column of Adventure Comics #386 (1969):

Good point. We all know DC would never let its heroes walk around in public calling each other by their given names! Why, that's just absurd! It's unimaginable! It's...

What? Oh. Never mind.

Seriously, though...did Mort Weisinger really believe that the readers of a comic book couldn't handle the concept of secret identities? If readers could handle the fact that Kal-El, Clark, Superman, and Nightwing were "all names for the same person", why couldn't they do the same for Kara's names? Or is he suggesting that Supergirl readers are stupider than Superman readers??

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Take Your Stinking Claws Off Me...

...you damn dirty ape:

Where's my damn banana, human?Thank you, Jonathon Hickman amd JM Ringuet, for giving us Wolverine in monkey form, not to mention Charlton Heston's worst nightmare.

RIP, Chuck.

Ook snikt from Transhuman #1

Monday, April 7, 2008

Manic Monday--I Know What Boys Want

Presented without comment, a letter from Adventure Comics #386:

Anything I say here will just get me into trouble...

Sunday, April 6, 2008

Kontinuity Kop: Silent But Stupid

Here there be spoilers for Skrullapalooza #1.

Sometimes, in reading comics, you come across something so egregious, so monstrously careless, so inexcusable, it transcends the term "cock-up," and enters the category "the creators just don't care."

Let's go to the tape. Start with New Avengers: Illuminati #5. This is the issue where Tony "I'm a Good Fascist" Stark takes the body of the Skrull Elektra to the other Illuminati (Namor, Charles Xavier, Dr. Strange, Black Bolt & Reed Richards) and says "um, look, we have a secret invasion going on here..." Please note specifically these panels:

See, look--that's Reed Right there!
Reed has a plan...which apparently he promptly forgot!!...wherein Reed Richards plainly hears and acknowledges that this Skrull was undetectable by normal means. See? Reed was right there, and discussing it.

Next, check out this:

Reed Richards: putting catch phrases over logic
Marvel heroes; turning their back on world invasion since...hey, wait a minute!!...wherein, after "Black Bolt's" betrayal, Reed declares that they can't trust each other, and they basically refuse to work with Stark. Good defenders of the Earth there, but that's what Bendis and Brian Reed give us.

So, you got that? Reed KNOWS this Skrull is different, knows about the Secret Invasion going on, and decided he couldn't trust anyone enough to work on them with this. Got it?

This takes us to Skrullapalooza #1, wherein we see Stark addressing Reed & Hank Pym:

Tony Stark, world's most forgetful fascist futurist!Uhhh Tony, you ALREADY let Reed in on the secret, remember??

And this:

Virtually repeating the same dialogue...
Not consistent, AND out-of-character dialogue...that's why we love Bendis!!Reed, how can this be "new?" YOU WERE THERE!! You were there when Tony revealed Skrullektra, you were there when Black Bolt turned green, you were an active participant. PLUS, you refused to work with Stark...now it's okey-dokey???

And (spoiler alert, last warning): since we know by the end of Secret Invasion #1 that Reed isn't a Skrull, couldn't you argue that the Reed in NA:I #5 might have been? Yeah, but if so, that makes Stark stupider than Jupiter, because he would KNOW that Reed should have already known, right? But Stark doesn't even notice!

Seriously, in a series all about a vast conspiracy, how the frell can you screw up the most simple but fundamental plot point--which characters already knows about the conspiracy?? It's not like the same guy didn't write it (okay, Bendis only co-wrote NA:I, but even if you want to argue he didn't write the parts in question, can you seriously believe that he didn't read the whole thing?!?). The same guy edited both mags--(Tom Brevoort, I seriously hope you're donating your pay for those issues to charity, because you sure didn't earn it).

Given that Bendis and Quesada have been boasting loudly how vast the masterplan for this series is, and how deeply enmeshed in the past few years' continuity it is, how could something so amateurish and careless happen?

Answer 1: They're really not as smart as they think they are. So get prepared for 7 more issues of continuity cock-ups and reveals that just don't make sense, because this crew just can't handle this type of thing.

Answer 2: They just don't care. Really, they're just throwing it out there and waiting for the dollars to roll in from the next line of Skrullified action figures. It's screwed up, but THEY JUST DON'T GIVE A DAMN whether it makes sense, or even if it's consistent from one story to the next. Get used to it.

Other random Skrullapalooza notes:
  • After the events of issue #1, we can't really call it a "secret" invasion anymore, can we? A massive space fleet, the Helicarrier crashing in NYC (which looks amazing unspoiled after the devastation of World War: Hulk), the Baxter Building blowing up (again, apparently rebuilt after WWH...seriously, the damage from WWH hasn't shown up in ANY other Marvel mag...do these guys even read each others' books??)...I'd say it's in the open now, making the last 7 issues of this series shockingly mistitled...

  • This is probably meaningless, but there were a number of dialogue changes between the 2-page preview Newsarama showed us. Compare the following panel with the one from the actual issue I showed you above:
    What, now we can't call out Wolverine and Spider-Man by name?I don't know that it means anything--it seems mostly things were tightened up and clutter removed--but it is interesting.

  • Some wonderfully ham-fisted expository dialogue...like the tour guide just happening to explain the Negative Zone for us just seconds before the fake Sue goes and opens it, and Norman Osborn actually having epalian to the Thunderbolts what the Thunderbolts are (in Bendis' defense, Moonstone's rejoinder mocks that..but the point remains, it was fairly artless), the explanation of S.W.O.R.D., the explanation of the Savage Land...It's bad enough that Bendis can't write normal dialogue, but this kind of info dump is really not his fortè, is it?

  • There's some dead people in the shipload of "returned heroes," which might be a good strategy by the Skrulls: make the world believe that the ones who died were Skrulls, and these are real. Except that doesn't jibe with what we already know, does it? Thanks to Skrullectra, we KNOW that when these type of Skrulls die, the revert to their normal green alien bodies, right? So if, for example, "our" Mockingbird or Phoenix or Hawkeye had been a Skrull, we would have known it...but they didn't revert, therefore they weren't Skrulls, therefore these newcomers are fakes. So either the Skrulls are stupid, or Bendis can't keep his premise straight. I report, you decide!

  • Two things I will say about the "returned heroes." #1, it would be unexpectedly brilliant if one or 2 of them ARE real, and they've been tricked into thinking that the rest of them were real, so the rest of the returners get instant credibility. That would be a good twist. #2, I will give Bendis one trillion bonus points if the "returned" Spider-Man remembers being married to Mary Jane. It'll never happen, but still...
Ahh, it's a sunny day...enough ranting!! Go play!!

Saturday, April 5, 2008

Housekeeping

Well, this is post #250, and my personal version of March Madness is over, so it's a good time for a little bit of housekeeping around here.

Just for the heck of it, I'm trying a new template...we'll see how long it lasts. I've also added a few new beta Blogger apps, and I hope they won't bog things down too much. Specifically:
  • An updated blogroll (long overdue), with a new widget that makes the list also act as a mini-RSS, showing when each blog was last updated, and the title of the most recent post. This is a work in progress, lots more blogs to add.
  • The "Search This Blog" box at the top of the sidebar (not the one along the top titlebar) now searches not only Slay Monstrobot, but also every blog in my blogroll AND every blog I've ever linked to. Sort of a mini-Cerebra. Have fun.
  • Yeah, I've added a baseball scoreboard widget. If I've got to suffer with the #$%^ing Cubs all summer, so do you.

There'll be more tinkering in the next few days as I work a bug or two out, and change my mind 17 times about fonts and colors, and probably experiment with another widget or 4. That's the flipside of my laziness--when I find the energy, I can get really picky and anal, and can't stop tinkering.

My schedule should get a lot more regular, with postings happening daily (or more often!! Damn this burst of energy!!).

The upside of all this energy: I'm really gonna lay into Skrullapalooza tomorrow....

Friday, April 4, 2008

When Carrot Top Went To Oa


Make 'em laugh...It's like Hal Jordan meets a kinder, gentler Joker...still deadly, though....Perhaps he should have translated it into German, first (one word at a time).

Still, he's less deadly than Dane Cook...

Thursday, April 3, 2008

Final Crisis Preview--Anthro

So, Grant Morrison has told us that Final Crisis will have Anthro on the first page and Kamandi on the last.

Really, Grant? Really?

Uh, ladies...Anthro is NO prizeLet's not forget Prez and Brother Power, while you're at it...Angel and the Ape? Sugar and Spike?

Anthro--the caveman Archie Andrews!!

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

You've Come a Long Way, Kara

Yesterday we discussed Superman's hideous attempt to cut off Supergirl from everything she loves because of a trivial little mistake.

But as I alluded to, this was only the tiniest part of Supergirl's travails that issue (although it was the part that made the cover). After getting the cold shoulder from Superjerk, Kara returns to Stanhope College, only to find someone is dancing in her cabbage patch. Someone has been controlling her Linda Danvers and Supergirl robots, and also using mysterious powers to cause all of her attempts to help people to backfire.

Who's dissing the Maid of Might in her own crib? Why, it's the mysterious Topar!! And wait until you get a load of his reason why:

Is that Mr. Game & Watch from Nintendo?Uh, what???

Topar, do you want to take this up with Wonder Woman?Oh, Topar, that is so not cool. Really, next you'll be berating her cow mouth and whore's heart.

Fortunately, the Co-Ed Crime Buster figures out (somehow) that Topar must be a robot, an boy, does she know how to deal with robots:

Every 60's DC superhero was required to have a U-shaped electromagnet handy, just in caseAnd Topar's secret origin:

Uh, Kara...you're trusting this douchebot?Wha???

Oh, Jor-El, if you had spent a little less time programming sexist robots, and more time saving Krypton...Okay, that's actually a good plan, Jor-El. So, how'd it go?

Amazingly enough, I've never read this storyWAIT A MINUTE!! Tangent Rant!! You mean we had, in the Silver Age, a super-powered Kryptonian robot who, having trained Superboy, went to travel the stars to find and train other super-youth?? Why, oh, why, was this never ever ever followed up by a story in the Legion of Super-Heroes????? It would have been sooooo perfect....

Rant over. Back to Topar's deal. When he looked back at Earth to check up on Kal-El, he saw that Kara had shown up. And...

Note to 21st century artists: see, you can draw a female superhero without showing her butt cheeks
Topar, troglodyteBut wait...you were programmed by Jor-El. Does this mean that
a) Jor-El was a sexist bastard who didn't think that girls could handle super-powers?
b) Jor-El was a shitty programmer?

Really..."emotionally incapable of performing super-deeds correctly?" Fortunately, Supergirl triumphed over Topar's plan, and Topar acknowledges her worth and heads off back into space (hello!! He's a robot!! He can live for 1000 years easily!! He can test/train Legionnaires!! hello!!).

So, remembering that we're grading on a 1969 curve, should we be
a) upset that a figure who represents the wisdom of Krypton doubts the competence of female heroes, and in a particularly offensive and sexist fashion? ("Emotionally incapable?" Sheesh!)
or b) glad that Supergirl proved herself, and changed the sexist robot's mind?

Given that relative youngster Cary Bates wrote this story, I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt and see this as a victory for feminism...at least as great a victory as could have been possible in a DC book published in the 60's. Let's assume that Bates meant to say that Topar spoke not just for Jor-El, but DC's old guard editors, who just loved to portray their female heroes as emotional wrecks who were far more easily distracted and defeated than their male counterparts. So all the offensive twaddle Topar spouts is the just standard old guards' viewpoints, which he (via Kara) proceeds to shoot down.

So when Supergirl overcomes her blunder, passes Topar's trials, and gets Superman's forgiveness, in context it's a resounding victory for women, and the first step in Hillary Clinton's campaign for the presidency. Hey, wait a minute...

My Work Here Is Done

Today somebody found this blog with the Google search term "Jimmy Olsen armpit hair."

Really, words fail me.

Then again, Slay Monstrobot was the first result to come up, so I'm clearly doing something...right? Wrong? Insane?

So welcome, seeker of Jimmy Olsen armpit hair. Pull up a chair and stay awhile.

The post in question.

And if you're bored, Google "man-on-animal action" (use the hyphens). Once again, I'm #1 Woooo!! My quest to control the internet is nearing fruition...bwahahahahaha!!!

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Anger Management Issues

Since my friend Mark just did a series on the 50th anniversary of the Fortress of Solitude, I thought I'd chip in with one of the covers he didn't cover:

Uhhh...how do *you* get in now, smart guy?What a dick!! She's your cousin, your only living relative, the only member of your freakin' species that's left, and you not only lock her out, but booby-trap the bloody key?

Why, exactly, would Kal-El be so cruel to Kara?

Uh, maybe you could, you know, MOVE OUT OF THE WAY?!?
Superman, or Superpuss?
He wrote nasty stuff on your Facebook, tooSo you see, if his protoge makes a small mistake, if Mr. Invulnerable feels even a teensy bit of pain, his reaction is to cut off his loved ones, ban them from his house, and flippin' booby trap the place?? Does this strike you as normal behavior?

Well, by the end of the issue he repents. Good save, Clark!! All's well that ends well!

I should note, as well, that the scene on the cover never occurs in the book...the Maid of Might's thought balloon above is as close as we get...and since it's actually a very very minor part of the story, it's practically a lie to put it on the cover.

Ah, but what was the story, you ask?? Tune in tomorrow, as we learn the Superman wasn't the only dickweed from Krypton who rained on Supergirl's parade that day.

Scene too fabulous to actually depict inside the issue is from Adventure Comics #382, 1969.

Monday, March 31, 2008

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Smackdown!! Or Was It?

While researching my bit on Atlas Comics, I came across this awesome little tidbit, which I had never heard before, from an article by Jon B. Cooke at the Atlas Archives website, originally published in the magazine Comic Book Artist (Dec 2001):
One of [Marvel publisher] Martin [Goodman]'s outrageously successful business moves during the last years of his tenure at Marvel was to trick the industry's top company, DC Comics (then called National Periodical Publications), into committing an ultimately disastrous page-count and pricing change for the publisher of Superman, resulting in what then DC editorial director (soon to be publisher) Carmine Infantino characterized as a "slaughter" committed by Marvel upon his company. In an audaciously daring move, the House of Ideas raised the page count of its regular titles 75% from 32 to 48 pages, accompanied by a 75% price hike from 15¢to 25¢ on its October and November 1971 cover-dated books. Immediately DC followed suit, though significantly increasing their page count 100%, from 32 to 64 pages. But within a month, in a move that sent shockwaves through the industry, Goodman immediately dropped page count back to 32 pages yet only reducing the price per book to 20¢, still a 25% price increase from two months prior.

The results of Martin's gambit? Marvel was able to give wholesalers a 50% discount off the cover price of their line, as compared to DC's mere 40% price break. And whose titles would the retailers be more likely to push, do you think? Plus, what kid could resist getting five snappy, all-new Marvels for a buck, compared to four DCs, padded with moldy, old reprints? Also, as DC had to lock into ordering huge quantities of paper-a full year's supply-the publisher was trapped at the 25¢, 64-page format for an entire year. (Historian Carl Gafford has surmised that the Wage and Price Controls of President Richard Nixon's Administration may have also played a factor in the DC debacle, a proposition CBA intends to examine with Gaff in the future.) Those 12 months were all the time DC's competitor needed to come out on top and, for the first time in their decades-old rivalry, Marvel surpassed DC in sales, only rarely looking back in the quarter-century passed since that fateful year. The DC supremacy on the comics racks ended in 1972 after an astonishing 35-year reign, a dynasty suddenly in disarray, scrambling to get back on top, while Martin Goodman sat very prettily indeed, ensconced in his new role as the King of Comics in this New Marvel Age.
Isn't that just crazy amazing? Can you just imagine Marvel pulling a complete financial jiu jitsu on DC like that? That is so amazing, I would make it a Friday Night Fights if we weren't on hiatus right now (hey, print is black and white, right?). Would such a thing be possible today?

However, there's a pretty big problem with this tale: the timeline doesn't work, at least not the way Cooke describes it. It fact, a lot about it doesn't ring correct:
  • DC went up in price BEFORE Marvel did. DC went to 25¢ and a higher page count in issues dated August 1971. Marvel didn't go up to 25¢ until October 1971. That sure sounds like Marvel was reacting to DC's move, not vice versa.
  • Just in case you think there might be some confusion between street dates and cover dates, all the Marvel September issues were emblazoned with "Still 15¢". Again, that clearly implies that Marvel was reacting to DC's increase, and advertising that. You saw the exact same thing in 1976, when DC went to 30¢, and for months Marvel emblazoned their covers with "Still Only 25¢".
  • It's possible that DC was acting preemptively, I suppose, in response either to an announcement Marvel had made, or a leak from their offices. But if that's the case, was it really some master plan of Goodman's to kick DC in the groin financially? Or did he just get lucky? If it was a deliberate ploy, wasn't Goodman taking a gamble that DC would make the price/page jump in response? If this was some Machiavellian "gambit," what's the move if DC doesn't react, and doesn't go up first?
  • DC wasn't "trapped at the 64-page format for an entire year." In fact, they were NEVER at 64 pages regularly. According to the GCD database, the page count the month DC went up to 25¢ was 52 (and later 48). Some of their comics still had their regular twice-a-year 64-page Giant (see the next item), but the regular issues were never 64 pages during that year-long period.
  • Those "moldy, old reprints" were nothing new. In that period, DC every year turned 2 regular issues of their titles (July and December) into 80 or 64-page Giants, priced at 25¢, featuring nothing but reprints. If that hadn't hurt DC's sales, it's hard to fathom why the same price and format lead off by brand new stories would turn off the "kids." (Plus, on an editorial note, how many great stories were reprinted in those issues that we never would have gotten to see otherwise? "Moldy" my butt...)

I plead complete ignorance on the matter of wholesaler rates, year-long paper purchases, and wage and price controls. But the stuff I do know about, by simply looking at the covers of the comics and checking dates, seems to call into question how correct Cooke's story is.

Damn...another great anecdote ruined by the facts!! And here i was hoping Joe Quesada could trick DC into going down to $1.99...

Saturday, March 29, 2008

Things I Must See Before I Die

Tops on the list: Why the hell haven't we seen this yet?

Dumb...


versus

...and dumber
C'mon, Marvel and DC, make this happen . NOW!!!