data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63518/6351867c200e7d3b482152fe2008e8b7e1bc3108" alt=""
OK,
classless and
silly, in a 1940's novelty sort of way...but
dirtiest?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b19b/0b19bdffeb031b0775838b4675d0541e118d802a" alt=""
OK, it's funny to laugh at the idea that anybody would pay for this tie, that you'd actually wear a tie to work that turns into a glowing sexual harassment billboard in the dark. And the concept that it will cause
AWE is just an example of
Clarke's Law at work. But
filthy?!?
Magnificent?
High class?
Distinctive?
OK, OK, make fun of it...but
dirtiest ad of the 1940's? How can I possibly claim that?
Just read
this:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5238/e523832f7884d235b9c23cef7bab67be78665a49" alt=""
Hidden batteries? Horseplay? "
A thing of loveliness...emerges gradually to life, touched by the wand of darkness, and your girl will gasp with wonder as it takes form so amazingly."
Wow.
Wertham was right.
Ad from Atomic Bomb Comics #1 (1946)
2 comments:
Man. I suspect whoever wrote the copy for that ad went on to write really bad romance novels.
This is clearly the inspiration for radioactive Spider-Cum.
Post a Comment